 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Administrative offices |
Academic Degree Program Assessment
School of Architechture, Civil Engineering Technology and Construction
Use of Results Report
CM - BS Construction
1. Please list the Program Outcomes which were met and briefly discuss these.
1- Estimate construction project implementation costs.
2- Produce construction project implementation schedules.
3- Carryout construction project management related tasks.
4- Demonstrate people skills to function as a team player.
5- Demonstrate communication ability with construction project team members.
6- Demonstrate capability to pursue advanced degree programs.
7- Analyze process materials and methods of construction from an ethical, social and environmental responsible prospective.
2. If any program outcomes were not met, please list these and discuss these in more detail.
None
3. Chairs
A. Please discuss how you think that or anticipate that these results might be used.
We will continue to raise the performance criteria levels to promote improvements.
B. Please note below when you are tentatively planning to discuss these results and the use of these results with your faculty and with others.
We discuss the department outcome assessments at our regular monthly Faculty meetings
4. Dates of Meetings: Please list below the dates of meetings at which the use of assessment results was discussed and also briefly summarize the discussions and decisions.
A. Meeting Dates:
8/14/07, 9/12/07, 10/10/07, 11/14/07, 01/23/08, 03/12/08, 04/09/08
B. Decisons made and actions taken:
Assessment Process, Requirements, Documentations, Report of the goals and
outcomes, Discussion of the improvement measures to be taken.
For CNST 4900,
Objective – Ensure that Capstone projects are properly evaluated.
Initiated By–This plan is presented in response to Outcomes
Assessment data and discussions from Fall 2006, made available at the
Fall 2006 CNST Kick-off Meeting, which suggests that industry panels may
not understand how to properly evaluate each section of Capstone project.
Time Frame – This plan was implemented on or before the next offering
of this course, which was in Spring Semester 2007.
Specific Implementation Method – A weighting system shall be established
which will be distributed to the Capstone panelists. This weighting system
will assign a value to each of the sections of the Capstone project based on
the importance of that section or aspect of the project. A draft of
the weighting system will be circulated to CM faculty to ensure consensus
on the values. The syllabus and/or handbook will also be changed to reflect
this weighting system.
For CM 4800,
Updated scenarios that the students worked on based on more recent issues.
Added scenario on construction safety based on actual accidents reported by
the students on their project sites.
Included new lectures for preparing the students for CM 4900 which follows
this course.
Some new measureable course outcomes may be added to the syllabus.
C. If you would like to provide links to the minutes of meetings at which assessment results
were discussed, please do so below:
Please see the following link:
(1)Fall07 Spring 08 Meeting minutes(to be provided)
Meeting Minutes 08/14/07
Meeting Minutes 09/12/07
Meeting Minutes 10/10/07
Meeting Minutes 11/14/07
Meeting Minutes 01/23/08
Meeting Minutes 03/12/08
Meeting Minutes 04/09/08(2)And Dept of Construction Management website, Construction Assessment 2004 - 2007
Academic Degree Program Assessment (ARCH, CET, CNST)
