3-12-2003
NOTE: At times, issues of confidentiality may require that some items discussed in meetings be excluded from these minutes.
PRESENT: Bill Barnes, Dick Aynsley, Alan Gabrielli, Mike Murphy, Sandy Pfeiffer, Dawn Ramsey, Judy Waits, Steve Hamrick
GUEST: Bill Gruszka
1. Budget:
Hamrick said he and Pfeiffer
are discussing the best use of the money given to Academic Affairs for
the remainder of the year.
2. Indirect Cost Distribution:
Ramsey met with Hamrick,
McCord, and Whitaker about the recommended distribution of indirect cost
distribution for grants and contracts. McCord and Whitaker felt strongly
about a 50/50 split for the $30,000. Ramsey is to ask Betsy Adams
to collect more information about percentages from similar institutions
and revisit this issue in the future.
3. IT Support Plan:
Deans briefly discussed
the new IT support plan and made several suggestions: (1) have a transition
period, possibly after graduation, (2) have a committee established for
questions/problems, (3) have a training program to establish backup procedures
for hard drives, and (4) have Bill Gruszka visit the deans council once
per month.
Bill Gruszka visited the deans and restated his support for academic affairs. He also has been working on reorganization within his division and gave the deans a proposed organization chart.
4. Reorganization:
Pfeiffer said the BOR passed
the reorganization plan without comment.
5. Building M:
Pfeiffer indicated that
we will be proceeding with renovation of the lab space in Building M, assuming
we have MMR money. Pfeiffer talked to Kashiri who indicated that
Building M is at the top of his list and that we will have money for the
renovation.
6. Needs of Night Students:
The president had asked
two questions: (1) what are the problems, and (2) what data do we have
that we are responding. Hamrick is to talk to Jeff Orr about an informational
brochure on the ATTIC, signage, and about communicating to faculty, staff,
and students that the ATTIC is open in the evenings to help students.
The ATTIC will gather data from visiting students as to the type of help
needed.
7. Faculty/MGT Decisions:
Pfeiffer will be making
the decision whether to implement the report.
8. Student Evaluations:
The SIRS evaluations will
continue for the coming year. The current P&P is being reviewed
and it would violate the P&P to discontinue or change the procedure.
As soon as the faculty approve the P&P, then a faculty committee should
be appointed to implement a new procedure for AY 2004-2005.