Deans Council Meeting
October 21, 2009
B-120
Members
Absent: Jeff Orr, Han Reichgelt
Guests: Dawn Ramsey, Venu Dasigi for
Han Reichgelt
Item 1. Updates
Dawn
Ramsey visited the Council today and asked for help with Future Cities. The competition will be on January 23, 2010
on the SPSU campus and has considerably more schools and teams registered than
last year’s competition. Dawn stated a
real need for judges, mentors for the schools, volunteers for the day of the
competition, etc. as well as help with fund
raising. She is still in need of three
major contributions of $4,500 and special awards in the amount of $250 each to
reach the $18,000 needed. She encouraged
the Council to contact their advisory boards for sponsors and/or donations and
also expressed a concern that next year the competition may outgrow the space
we have available on our campus forcing them to move to an off-campus venue.
Dr.
Szafran updated the Council on the following:
Item 2. Research Centers
Russ
Hunt updated the Council on the status of the research center proposals (eight
posted and two more to be posted soon) and explained the budgetary structure/division
of indirect costs associated with the centers.
Additionally he explained the difference between grants and contracts
and the advantages and disadvantages of each.
Because of the complex nature of this topic, Russ will send out a
detailed email to the Council. The
Council also discussed requests Russ Hunt has received for start-up funds for
some of the centers and whether they should be funded or not. The consensus from the Council was that Russ
Hunt may approve requests for up to $500 and any amount over that must be approved
by the Deans Council. Additionally,
these are considered loans and must be repaid.
The Council was then asked to vote on the proposals for centers that
have been posted and they were unanimously approved. These will go forward to the VPAA and the President
for final approval.
Item 3. Teaching Apples Proposal
Keith
Hopper sent a “Teaching Apples” proposal to Dr. Szafran outlining an
inexpensive way to reward faculty for good teaching, wherein students could
nominate faculty for a teaching apple.
All faculty who were nominated would get an
Apple pin with the year of the nomination, and could wear those pins at
graduation ceremonies, etc. The Council
reviewed and discussed the proposal, but did not reach a consensus in favor of
adopting.
Item 4. Space
This
topic was continued from last week’s Council meeting. Space is and will continue to be a problem as
we grow even with the completion of the new building next year and renovations
of existing buildings. Of highest
priority is to find short and long-term solutions to the shortage of
classrooms/labs, faculty offices, staff/administrative offices as well determining
how to divide or share existing classrooms and labs as new programs and
personnel are added. Most departments on
campus have a number of classrooms and labs “assigned” to their department and
get first choice of these spaces when scheduling classes. Once the deadline has passed for entering the
schedule, all open space is then available to everyone but this has caused some
friction between departments. Dr.
Szafran stated that he is in favor of letting the deans
work out space issues and is also in favor of allowing departments to continue
to have certain space assigned to them because of the specialized needs in most
departments. He also stressed the need
to use all space efficiently and that non-specialized space should be scheduled
to serve students in the most efficient manner.
Meeting
adjourned at 4:30 PM